Wealthy nations must reach zero fossil‑fuel emissions by around 2030, while globally phase‑out needs to happen by 2040 or earlier. This must be accompanied by fairness both between and within nations. Professor Kevin Anderson highlights that the top 10 % of emitters cause half of global emissions and the top 1 % emit twice as much as the bottom 50 %.'


THREE DECADES OF CLIMATE MITIGATION: WHY HAVEN'T WE BENT THE GLOBAL EMISSIONS CURVE?  'To hell in a hand cart'  Prof Kevin Anderson  Nick Breeze Podcast 1 Oct 2021



Prof Kevin Anderson

Nick Breeze Podcast 1 Oct 2021


Question:
To what extent does “https://youtu.be/lnoYIRhUqf8 Leading climate change expert, Professor Kevin Anderson gives a frank update on the past and current policies heading to global climate catastrophe, calling for a rapid change of course: “If we allow our "leaders" to go home from COP26 and do nothing to halt emissions, as they've done for the last 31 years, then we're doomed. The only hope: disruptive civil resistance to demand emissions are slashed. Compared to world leaders making decisions at COP26 “the protestors and the civil society movements … are much more in line with what the science is calling for.” 15 February 2024” compare with Professor Kevin Anderson's latest views?

You’re asking how Professor Kevin Anderson’s earlier COP26-era message (February 15, 2024) compares with his most recent views as of mid‑2025.
🔍 February 2024 (COP26-era)

In the YouTube clip (dated around that time), Anderson warned that if global leaders continue going home from COP summits without halting emissions—as they had for 31 years—we’re headed for catastrophe. He emphasized that disruptive civil resistance is the only hope, calling protestors and civil society more aligned with scientific demands than world leaders.

🧠 Kevin Anderson’s Latest Views (early 2025)
1. Emissions must be stopped, not slowly reduced


He now consistently argues that “a reduction is not enough. We have to stop emissions altogether.” Incremental reductions and “net zero” frameworks amount to kicking the can down the road and are inadequate. (YouTube, UAB Barcelona)

2. COP negotiations are deeply compromised

He critiques the COP process as “co‑opted” by fossil fuel interests and dominated by elite high‑emitters and lobbyists. Civil society voices are marginalized, while industry insiders maintain power. (sustainabilitycurriculum.co.uk)

3. Mitigation denial exists even among experts

He has expanded his critique to include the academic and scientific community: many climate scenarios rely on future carbon-removal technologies that may never materialize, reflecting a form of “mitigation denial.” (factsustain.org, UAB Barcelona)

4. Equity, fossil fuel phase‑out, and social justice

He now emphasises that wealthy nations must reach zero fossil‑fuel emissions by around 2030, while globally phase‑out needs to happen by 2040 or earlier. This must be accompanied by fairness both between and within nations. He highlights that the top 10 % of emitters cause half of global emissions, and the top 1 % emit twice as much as the bottom 50 %. (sustainabilitycurriculum.co.uk)

5. Urgency and failure of Framing

He stresses that emissions have risen ~60 % since the 1992 Rio summit, and accumulating CO₂ makes the situation worse each year. The failure lies not in scientific awareness, but in the refusal of leaders and institutions to confront the scale of change needed. (sustainabilitycurriculum.co.uk)

✅ Comparison at a Glance

Theme/ February 2024 (COP26 Era)/ Early 2025 (Latest Views)

Fix / Disruptive civil resistance & protest / Stopping emissions altogether; no reliance on “net zero” or slow reductions

Target/ COP leaders vs protestors/ Beyond leadership, calling out academics, lobbyists, and systemic elite bias

Outlook/ 
Doom unless protest compels change/ Further urgency: leaders have consistently failed since 1992; cumulative delay

Strategy/ Mobilization of civil society/ Radical social justice framing; rapid fossil‑fuel phase‑out; equity at center

🎯 Summary

Anderson’s core message hasn't changed—he has long criticised the empty promises of global summits and stressed that true change will come from grassroots pressure. However, his emphasis has increasingly shifted:

From framing protestors vs leaders to a broader exposé of systemic mitigation denial, including within academia.

From urgent warnings to clear deadlines and pathways: wealthy nations must reach zero by 2030, global by 2040.

From calling for protest action to advocating deep social transformation grounded in equity, not just technological fixes or net-zero pledges.

In both periods, his tone remains uncompromising: rhetoric alone has failed, and only rapid, honest, and equitable action offers hope.’

Source: https://chatgpt.com/c/68877501-e3ec-800a-8180-db5a80bdb00e

NOTE ‘It is crucial to exercise critical rationality and verify AI-generated reports because:
AI can reproduce bias or errors from its training data or sources.
Generated content may sound authoritative while being factually incorrect, misleading, or outdated.
Nuance and context are often lost without human judgement.
Verification ensures accountability, especially in political, legal, or scientific topics.
Ethical responsibility demands users actively engage with sources to avoid spreading misinformation. Always cross-check claims with credible references and use AI as a tool, not an unquestioned authority.’ #ChatGPT Llewelyn Pritchard 13 June 2025

Links
https://www.blueskypacks.com/starter-packs/zero-emissions-advocacy https://www.blueskypacks.com/starter-packs/zero-emissions-advocacy https://trumpsauthoritarianassault.blogspot.com/2025/07/wealthy-nations-must-reach-zero.html 
https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vSQ3Px-Nwsc4_tl9c-sqtfA8-raDkfhamwi2jdt4s6Ekf1Ypxa9XMzErOCdVT7XlHRBCs5h-b5NC-VA/pub "Wealthy nations must reach zero fossil‑fuel emissions by around 2030, while globally phase‑out needs to happen by 2040 or earlier. This must be accompanied by fairness both between and within nations. He highlights that the top 10 % of emitters cause half of global emissions, and the top 1 % emit twice as much as the bottom 50 %.” Professor Kevin Anderson #ChatGPT Llewelyn Pritchard 28 July 2025

Popular posts from this blog

BORIS JOHNSON and DAVID CAMERON EXPOSED: Evidence-Based Investigation into Russian Influence, Corruption and Democratic Erosion in UK Politics 2016–25

The combination of Boris Johnson’s leadership of the Brexit campaign and his subsequent actions as Prime Minister created the conditions for Putin's greatest strategic victory in post-Cold War Europe: the division and weakening of the Western alliance through Britain's departure from the EU - Putin's Brexit Ambitions: A Comprehensive Analysis’

CALL OUT FOR A FULLY INDEPENDENT PUBLIC INQUIRY: Investigating Boris Johnson’s Role in Russian State-Mafia Interference in UK Politics (2010–2022)