LP-152 ELECTIONS UNDER ASSAULT: DEFENDING DEMOCRACY — UK & US Evidence, Foreign Interference, Political Finance, Disinformation, Kompromat, Electoral Vulnerabilities & Democratic Safeguards
LP-152 ELECTIONS UNDER ASSAULT: DEFENDING DEMOCRACY - UK & USA Since the UK Government did not simply respond by conducting the retrospective assessment recommended by the ISC (about potential Russian interference in the EU referendum) give a valid and reliable, evidence-based explanation why the retrospective assessment should immediately go-ahead to: Strengthen the UK State and Government and its reputation for accountability; Strengthen the Prime Minister's accountability for elections; Instead of, by no action, b eing complicit in maintaining the Accountability Gap That was arguably, in Boris Johnson's favour in becoming PM; Preventing "no evidence", from becoming a permanent shield. “Yes. The evidence supports a strong case for arguing that the retrospective assessment should be undertaken now, not because it would prove that Boris Johnson's premiership was illegitimate, but because the unresolved evidential gap itself weakens the accountability of every...
